integration: be through substitution related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, service
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, migration
Weight: 0.33
, separation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be through substitution related 1.00
be through substitution 0.98
be through substitution related to chain rule 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(integration, be through substitution related)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(integration, be through substitution)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(integration, be through substitution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(integration, be through substitution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(integration, be through substitution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(integration, be through substitution related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(integration, be through substitution related)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(integration, be through substitution related)