intel: be considered better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better 1.00
be much better in terms 0.82
has quality better 0.79
is z370 good 0.79
is best 0.76
be good place work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(john deere, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(john deere, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(john deere, is best)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(samsung, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(intel, be considered better)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, is z370 good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be good place work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(intel, is best)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(intel, be good place work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(intel, is z370 good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(intel, be good place work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(intel, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(intel, is z370 good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(intel, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(intel, is best)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(intel, is best)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(intel, be good place work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, is z370 good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intel, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(intel, be considered better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intel, be considered better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(john deere, is best)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(intel, be considered better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(samsung, is best)