intel: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality worth 0.83
be much better in terms 0.82
has quality service 0.80
be considered better 0.79
is z370 good 0.79
be much better than amd 0.78
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(microprocessor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(customer, has quality service)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(customer, has quality service)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(samsung, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(samsung, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(john deere, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(microprocessor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(intel, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(intel, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(samsung, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(samsung, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(samsung, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(samsung, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(john deere, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(john deere, is best)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(samsung, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(intel, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intel, be considered better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(intel, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(intel, be much better than amd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(intel, be considered better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(intel, be considered better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(intel, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(intel, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(intel, be much better than amd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(intel, has quality service)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(intel, has quality service)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(intel, is z370 good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(intel, be much better than amd)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(intel, has quality service)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, is z370 good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, is z370 good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(intel, is z370 good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(intel, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intel, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality service)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(intel, is best)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(intel, is best)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(intel, be considered better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(intel, be much better than amd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(customer, has quality service)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(microprocessor, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(samsung, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(samsung, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(john deere, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(samsung, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intel, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(customer, has quality service)