intellect: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, creativity
Weight: 0.35
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, humility
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is good quality 0.92
is quality 0.87
is important quality 0.85
be bad on snapchat 0.85
be bad on instagram 0.85
has quality system 0.82
be good quality in leader 0.81
be good value have 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(empathy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(empathy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(humility, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(humility, is good quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is good quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is good quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(humility, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good value have)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(passion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(creativity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(passion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(creativity, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, is good quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(humility, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(humility, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(humility, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(humility, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(empathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(empathy, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(humility, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(humility, is good quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(honesty, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(honesty, is good quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(empathy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(empathy, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(honesty, be good value have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good value have)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, is important quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leader)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(intellect, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(intellect, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(empathy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(humility, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(empathy, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(creativity, is good quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(humility, is good quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honesty, is good quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(humility, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(honesty, be good value have)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leader)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(intellect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)