intellect: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, creativity
Weight: 0.35
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, humility
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good quality 0.98
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is important quality 0.90
be good quality in leader 0.85
be good quality in leadership 0.84
has quality system 0.84
is most important quality 0.83
be good value have 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(empathy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(empathy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(humility, is good quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is good quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(humility, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is good quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good value have)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(humility, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(creativity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(humility, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(humility, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(creativity, is good quality)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, is good quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(humility, is good quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(humility, is good quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(empathy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(empathy, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(honesty, is good quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(honesty, is good quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(empathy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(empathy, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(humility, is quality)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(humility, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(honesty, be good value have)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good value have)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(honesty, is most important quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(intellect, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(intellect, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(intellect, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intellect, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(creativity, is good quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(humility, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(humility, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(empathy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(empathy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(humility, is good quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(honesty, be good value have)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honesty, is good quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(honesty, is most important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intellect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)