intensity: be important in training program

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, level
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.54
, playing
Weight: 0.52
, tempo
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in training program 1.00
be important in exercise 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be important in training program)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(frequency, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frequency, be important in training program)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(intensity, be important in training program)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in exercise)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(intensity, be important in exercise)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(intensity, be important in exercise)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be important in exercise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be important in training program)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in training program)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be important in training program) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frequency, be important in training program)