interest: be added back to profit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be added back to profit 1.00
be related to profit 0.89
be on drawings added to net profit 0.86
be on drawings added to profit 0.85
is added back to fcff 0.80
is added back 0.80
is added back to ebitda 0.78
be added back before tax 0.78
be much higher than sales tax 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interest, be added back to profit)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(risk, be related to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interest, be added back to profit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(risk, be related to profit)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(risk, be related to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(interest, be added back to profit)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(interest, be added back to profit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(interest, be added back to profit)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interest, is added back to fcff)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(interest, be added back before tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(interest, is added back to ebitda)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(interest, is added back to fcff)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back before tax)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, is added back to ebitda)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(interest, is added back to fcff)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(interest, be added back before tax)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(interest, is added back to fcff)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(interest, be added back before tax)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(interest, is added back to ebitda)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(interest, is added back to ebitda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interest, be added back to profit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(risk, be related to profit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(risk, be related to profit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(interest, be added back to profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)