interest: be calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated 1.00
be calculated on 360 days 0.91
be calculated in states 0.90
be calculated on 360 day year 0.87
be calculated on island of montserrat 0.85
be calculated on island 0.85
be debt calculated 0.84
be calculated in india 0.83
be calculated in banks 0.83
be calculated in united states 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(risk, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(risk, be calculated on island of montserrat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(risk, be calculated on island) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(risk, be calculated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(risk, be calculated on island)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(risk, be calculated on island of montserrat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(risk, be calculated on island)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(risk, be calculated on island of montserrat)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(risk, be calculated)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(risk, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(risk, be calculated on island of montserrat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(risk, be calculated on island) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(interest rate, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be calculated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated on 360 days)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated on 360 day year)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated in banks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated on 360 days)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated on 360 day year)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated in banks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated on 360 days)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated on 360 day year)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated on 360 days)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated on 360 day year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated on island)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated on island of montserrat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(interest rate, be calculated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated on island)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(interest, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated on island of montserrat)