interest: be calculated in banks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated in banks 1.00
be loans calculated by banks 0.93
be calculated for home loan in banks 0.90
affect banks 0.88
be bad for banks 0.87
be loans calculated 0.86
be calculated in states 0.83
be calculated 0.83
be debt calculated 0.81
be profitable for banks 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(risk, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated in banks)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated in banks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(risk, be calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(risk, be calculated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(risk, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(interest rate, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be calculated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated in banks)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated for home loan in banks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(interest, be loans calculated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated for home loan in banks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(interest, be loans calculated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(interest, be calculated for home loan in banks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(interest, be loans calculated by banks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated for home loan in banks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(interest, be calculated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(interest, be loans calculated by banks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(interest, be loans calculated)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(interest, be loans calculated by banks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(interest, be loans calculated by banks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(interest, be loans calculated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest, be calculated in banks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(interest rate, be calculated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(interest, be calculated in banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(risk, be calculated)