interest: be charged on credit cards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be charged on credit cards 1.00
be on credit cards 0.91
work on credit cards 0.90
be on credit cards high 0.90
be damn high in credit cards 0.86
be charged on loans 0.84
be charged on 401k loans 0.84
be charged at beginning of loan 0.82
is charged 0.80
be charged at beginning 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, is charged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(interest rate, is charged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(interest rate, is charged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(interest, be charged on credit cards)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(interest, is charged)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(interest, be charged at beginning of loan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(interest, is charged)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(interest, be charged at beginning of loan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(interest, is charged)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(interest, be charged at beginning of loan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(interest, be charged at beginning of loan)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(interest, is charged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(interest, be charged on credit cards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(interest, be charged on credit cards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(interest, be charged on credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(interest rate, is charged)