interest: be high on student loans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on student loans high 1.00
be high on student loans 1.00
be for student loans high 1.00
be on student loans 0.98
be for student loans 0.98
be worked out for student loans 0.91
be loans 0.89
be added to loans 0.88
be higher for car loans 0.87
go up with loans 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be higher for car loans)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be worked out for student loans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(interest rate, be higher for car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be higher for car loans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(interest rate, be worked out for student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be worked out for student loans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(interest, be high on student loans)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest, be loans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(interest, be loans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(interest, be loans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(interest, be loans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(interest, be high on student loans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(interest, be high on student loans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(interest rate, be higher for car loans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(interest, be high on student loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(interest rate, be worked out for student loans)