interest: be in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in business 1.00
take in business 0.91
be important to businesses 0.83
affect businesses 0.82
affect small businesses 0.81
be important to insurance business 0.81
be profitable for commercial banks 0.79
be in company 0.79
be inevitable in business 0.79
follow business cycle 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(risk, be important to insurance business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(interest, be in business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(risk, take in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(interest, be in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(risk, be inevitable in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(interest, be in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(risk, take in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(risk, be inevitable in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(risk, be important to insurance business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(risk, take in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(risk, be important to insurance business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(risk, be inevitable in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, follow business cycle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be important to businesses)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, affect businesses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(risk, take in business)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(interest, be in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(risk, be important to insurance business)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(interest, be in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(risk, be inevitable in business)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(interest, be in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(interest rate, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(interest rate, affect businesses)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(interest rate, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be important to businesses)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(interest rate, follow business cycle)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(interest rate, follow business cycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(interest, be in business)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(interest, be in company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(interest, be in company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interest, be in company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(interest, be in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(risk, take in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(risk, be inevitable in business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(risk, be important to insurance business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(interest rate, affect businesses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(interest rate, be important to businesses)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(interest rate, follow business cycle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(risk, take in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(risk, be inevitable in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(interest, be in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(risk, be important to insurance business)