interest: be on drawings added to net profit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on drawings added to net profit 1.00
be on drawings added to profit 0.96
be added back to profit 0.86
be related to profit 0.82
be on drawings added 0.82
affect net cash flow 0.79
be on drawings 0.79
be on drawings charged 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income tax, affect net cash flow)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect net cash flow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(risk, be related to profit)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect net cash flow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income tax, affect net cash flow)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interest, be added back to profit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(interest, be added back to profit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(interest, be added back to profit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(interest, be added back to profit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(interest, be on drawings charged)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(interest, be on drawings charged)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(interest, be on drawings charged)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings charged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(income tax, affect net cash flow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(risk, be related to profit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(risk, be related to profit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(interest, be on drawings added to net profit)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(income tax, affect net cash flow)