interest: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality change 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
is bad thing 0.79
minimise bad thing 0.78
take bad 0.78
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(risk, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(risk, take bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(risk, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(interest, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)