interference: be vs obstruction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.64
, concern
Weight: 0.58
, action
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sanction
Weight: 0.32
, intervention
Weight: 0.31
, suspension
Weight: 0.31
, referee
Weight: 0.31
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs obstruction 1.00
be vs interference 0.81
be vs proactive interference 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(interference, be vs obstruction)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(interference, be vs interference)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(interference, be vs proactive interference)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(interference, be vs interference)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(interference, be vs proactive interference)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(interference, be vs interference)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(interference, be vs proactive interference)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(interference, be vs interference)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(interference, be vs proactive interference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(interference, be vs obstruction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(interference, be vs obstruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(interference, be vs obstruction)