intern: get treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents student
Weight: 0.69
, worker
Weight: 0.57
, training
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.54
Siblings assistant
Weight: 0.36
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, undergraduate
Weight: 0.33
, construction worker
Weight: 0.33
, apprentice
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get treated 1.00
is treated 0.96
is treated well 0.90
get treated badly 0.89
is treated badly 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is treated badly)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(assistant, is treated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(apprentice, is treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(assistant, is treated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(assistant, is treated)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated badly)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(apprentice, is treated badly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is treated badly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(intern, get treated)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(intern, is treated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated badly)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated badly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(intern, is treated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(intern, is treated well)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(intern, is treated well)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated well)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(intern, get treated badly)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(intern, is treated badly)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(intern, get treated badly)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated badly)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(intern, get treated badly)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(intern, is treated badly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intern, get treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apprentice, is treated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(assistant, is treated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apprentice, is treated badly)