intern: is treated well

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents student
Weight: 0.69
, worker
Weight: 0.57
, training
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.54
Siblings assistant
Weight: 0.36
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, undergraduate
Weight: 0.33
, construction worker
Weight: 0.33
, apprentice
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is treated well 1.00
is treated 0.91
get treated 0.90
is treated badly 0.88
get treated badly 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is treated badly)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(assistant, is treated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(apprentice, is treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is treated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(assistant, is treated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(assistant, is treated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated badly)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(apprentice, is treated badly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is treated badly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(intern, is treated well)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(intern, is treated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated badly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intern, get treated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated badly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(intern, is treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(intern, get treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(intern, get treated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(intern, get treated badly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(intern, is treated badly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(intern, get treated badly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated badly)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(intern, get treated badly)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(intern, is treated badly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(intern, is treated well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apprentice, is treated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(assistant, is treated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated well)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apprentice, is treated badly)