internet: be better than books

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.70
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
, network device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
Siblings web page
Weight: 0.36
, web
Weight: 0.36
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than books 1.00
be better than library 0.85
be better than library for research 0.82
be better than encyclopedia 0.78
be better than tv 0.78
be faster than computer 0.77
calls much more then texts cost 0.76
be faster than laptops 0.76
be more expensive than laptops 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(internet, be better than books)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(internet, be better than encyclopedia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(internet, be better than encyclopedia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(internet, be better than encyclopedia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(internet, be better than tv)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(internet, be better than tv)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(internet, be better than library)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(internet, be better than encyclopedia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(internet, be better than tv)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(internet, be better than library for research)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(internet, be better than tv)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(internet, be better than library)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(internet, be better than library)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(internet, be better than library for research)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(internet, be better than library)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(internet, be better than library for research)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(internet, be better than library for research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(internet, be better than books)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(internet, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(internet, be better than books)