internet: be linked to e-commerce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.70
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
, network device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
Siblings web page
Weight: 0.36
, web
Weight: 0.36
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be linked to e-commerce 1.00
be related 0.78
be connected 0.77
be traced 0.76
use links 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(web browser, be related)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(computer network, be connected)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(computer network, be connected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(web browser, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(web browser, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer network, be connected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(web page, be related)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(web page, use links)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(web browser, be related)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(computer network, be connected)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(web page, use links)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(web page, use links)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(web page, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(web page, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(internet, be linked to e-commerce)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(internet, be connected)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(internet, be connected)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(internet, be connected)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(internet, be connected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(computer network, be connected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(web browser, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(web page, use links)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web page, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(computer network, be connected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(internet, be linked to e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(web browser, be related)