interpolation: be more accurate than extrapolation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.50
, process
Weight: 0.49
, function
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
Siblings spline
Weight: 0.49
, algorithm
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.32
, compression
Weight: 0.31
, triangulation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more accurate than extrapolation 1.00
be better than extrapolation 0.96
is more accurate 0.88
is accurate 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(method, is more accurate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(method, is accurate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(method, is accurate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(interpolation, is accurate)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(interpolation, be better than extrapolation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpolation, is accurate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)