interpolation: is accurate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.50
, process
Weight: 0.49
, function
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
Siblings spline
Weight: 0.49
, algorithm
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.32
, compression
Weight: 0.31
, triangulation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is accurate 1.00
is more accurate 0.98
be more accurate than extrapolation 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpolation, is accurate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(method, is accurate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(method, is more accurate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(method, is accurate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(interpolation, is accurate)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is more accurate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, be more accurate than extrapolation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpolation, is accurate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(interpolation, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)