interpretation: play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, regulation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings belief
Weight: 0.64
, conclusion
Weight: 0.61
, translation
Weight: 0.60
, contradiction
Weight: 0.60
, definition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
play 1.00
is game 0.83
play role 0.82
be with game 0.82
be essential playing 0.79
play role in development 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(regulation, be essential playing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interpretation, play)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(issue, be with game)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interpretation, play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(issue, be with game)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(regulation, be essential playing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(issue, be with game)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be essential playing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(translation, play role)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contradiction, is game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(issue, be with game)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(regulation, be essential playing)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(translation, play role)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(translation, play role)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contradiction, is game)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(contradiction, is game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(interpretation, play)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(interpretation, play role in development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play role in development)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(interpretation, play role in development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interpretation, play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(issue, be with game)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(regulation, be essential playing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(translation, play role)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(contradiction, is game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(issue, be with game)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interpretation, play)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(regulation, be essential playing)