interrupt: be better than polling

Property	Similarity
be better than polling	1.00
be driven better polling	0.93
be driven better then polling	0.93
be driven polling	0.90
be driven then polling	0.90
be driven io better polling	0.87
be driven io better then polling	0.87

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

Parents	thing Weight: 0.59 , signal Weight: 0.51 , word Weight: 0.51 , event Weight: 0.50 , exception Weight: 0.48
Siblings	remember Weight: 0.32 , talk show Weight: 0.32 , full stop Weight: 0.32 , turn signal Weight: 0.32 , do Weight: 0.32

interrupt: be better than polling

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible