intervention: be in canada now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada now 1.00
be in canada 0.98
promote change in canada 0.87
use windows xp 0.79
xp 0.77
be on linux 0.76
be in ukraine 0.75
be paid for for europe 0.75
cause whole os 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(program, be paid for for europe)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(program, cause whole os)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(program, xp)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(program, xp)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(program, cause whole os)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(program, be paid for for europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, promote change in canada)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(program, xp)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(program, cause whole os)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(program, be paid for for europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(program, be paid for for europe)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(program, cause whole os)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(program, xp)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(intervention, be in canada now)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(intervention, be in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(intervention, be in ukraine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(intervention, be in ukraine)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in ukraine)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in ukraine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(program, xp)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(program, cause whole os)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(program, be paid for for europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(program, xp)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(program, cause whole os)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(program, be paid for for europe)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)