intervention: be in markets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in markets 1.00
affects estate markets 0.81
affects real estate markets 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(factor, affects estate markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intervention, be in markets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(factor, affects real estate markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intervention, be in markets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(factor, affects real estate markets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(factor, affects estate markets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(factor, affects real estate markets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(factor, affects estate markets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(factor, affects estate markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in markets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(factor, affects real estate markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in markets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(intervention, be in markets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in markets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intervention, be in markets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(factor, affects estate markets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(factor, affects real estate markets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(factor, affects estate markets)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(intervention, be in markets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(factor, affects real estate markets)