intestine: be efficient absorbing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.69
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.64
, organ
Weight: 0.64
, body part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings large intestine
Weight: 0.73
, small intestine
Weight: 0.40
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be efficient absorbing 1.00
be good absorbing 0.91
absorb water 0.77
be designed absorb 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tissue, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tissue, absorb water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tissue, absorb water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, absorb water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, absorb water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be designed absorb)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tissue, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(small intestine, be designed absorb)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be designed absorb)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(small intestine, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(small intestine, absorb water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(large intestine, absorb water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(large intestine, absorb water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intestine, be good absorbing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(intestine, be good absorbing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(intestine, be good absorbing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be good absorbing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(intestine, absorb water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(intestine, be designed absorb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(intestine, absorb water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(intestine, absorb water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(intestine, be designed absorb)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(intestine, be designed absorb)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(intestine, absorb water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be designed absorb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tissue, absorb water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small intestine, be efficient absorbing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(large intestine, absorb water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(small intestine, absorb water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(small intestine, be designed absorb)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(intestine, be efficient absorbing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tissue, absorb water)