intj: be bad at romance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents type
Weight: 0.36
Siblings element
Weight: 0.24
, lymphoma
Weight: 0.24
, case
Weight: 0.24
, plastic
Weight: 0.24
, description
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at romance 1.00
love enfps 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(intj, be bad at romance)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(intj, love enfps)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(intj, love enfps)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(intj, love enfps)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intj, love enfps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(intj, be bad at romance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(intj, be bad at romance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(intj, be bad at romance)