intj: is hated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents type
Weight: 0.36
Siblings element
Weight: 0.24
, lymphoma
Weight: 0.24
, case
Weight: 0.24
, plastic
Weight: 0.24
, description
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hated 1.00
be hated by types 0.89
be hated by other types 0.87
has state dislike 0.79
hate talk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(intj, is hated)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(intj, be hated by types)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(intj, be hated by types)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(intj, be hated by types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(intj, be hated by other types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(intj, be hated by other types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(intj, be hated by other types)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intj, be hated by types)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(intj, hate talk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(intj, hate talk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(intj, hate talk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(intj, be hated by other types)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(intj, hate talk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(intj, has state dislike)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(intj, has state dislike)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(intj, has state dislike)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(intj, has state dislike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(intj, is hated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intj, is hated)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(intj, is hated)