intolerance: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.58
, symptom
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lactose
Weight: 0.69
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, hatred
Weight: 0.33
, homophobia
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worse 0.87
is quality 0.87
is best quality 0.85
was bad 0.85
be bad for us 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theme, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(theme, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hatred, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lactose, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lactose, be bad for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(apathy, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(apathy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hatred, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hatred, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(apathy, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(apathy, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lactose, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lactose, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hatred, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hatred, feel good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lactose, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(lactose, be bad for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(intolerance, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is quality)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(intolerance, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is best quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(intolerance, is best quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intolerance, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intolerance, is best quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intolerance, was bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(intolerance, was bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apathy, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hatred, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lactose, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lactose, be bad for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)