intolerance: is best quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.58
, symptom
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lactose
Weight: 0.69
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, hatred
Weight: 0.33
, homophobia
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best quality 1.00
has quality good 0.89
is quality 0.89
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.85
has quality worse 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intolerance, is best quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intolerance, is best quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theme, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(theme, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lactose, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is best quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is best quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(apathy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hatred, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hatred, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lactose, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lactose, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(intolerance, is best quality)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is quality)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(intolerance, is quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intolerance, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intolerance, is best quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lactose, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)