intolerance: was bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.58
, symptom
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lactose
Weight: 0.69
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, hatred
Weight: 0.33
, homophobia
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad 1.00
is bad thing 0.86
has quality bad 0.85
be bad for us 0.83
is good thing 0.79
be bad for society 0.77
feel good 0.76
is worse initially 0.76
has quality good 0.76
be much worse at night 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(symptom, is worse initially)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intolerance, was bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(symptom, be much worse at night)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intolerance, was bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(symptom, be much worse at night)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(symptom, is worse initially)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(symptom, be much worse at night)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(symptom, is worse initially)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hatred, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hatred, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(apathy, be bad for society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lactose, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lactose, be bad for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(apathy, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(symptom, is worse initially)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(symptom, be much worse at night)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intolerance, was bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(apathy, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(apathy, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(hatred, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hatred, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hatred, feel good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hatred, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(apathy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hatred, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hatred, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lactose, be bad for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(lactose, be bad for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lactose, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lactose, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(apathy, be bad for society)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(apathy, be bad for society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(intolerance, was bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intolerance, was bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(symptom, is worse initially)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(symptom, be much worse at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apathy, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hatred, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hatred, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(apathy, be bad for society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lactose, be bad for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lactose, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(symptom, is worse initially)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(intolerance, was bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(symptom, be much worse at night)