introduction: be to mathematical finance

Related concepts

Parents	feature Weight: 0.64 , element Weight: 0.63 , part Weight: 0.61 , topic Weight: 0.59
Siblings	inclusion Weight: 0.33 , concept Weight: 0.32 , advent Weight: 0.32 , switch Weight: 0.32 , appearance Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be to mathematical finance	1.00
be to finance	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(introduction, be to mathematical finance)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(introduction, be to finance)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(introduction, be to finance)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(introduction, be to finance)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(introduction, be to finance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(introduction, be to mathematical finance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(introduction, be to mathematical finance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(introduction, be to mathematical finance)