introduction: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings inclusion
Weight: 0.33
, concept
Weight: 0.32
, advent
Weight: 0.32
, switch
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(inclusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(inclusion, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(introduction, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(introduction, has quality questions)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(introduction, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(introduction, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(introduction, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(introduction, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(introduction, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(introduction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(inclusion, has quality bad)