inuit: live during winters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents eskimo
Weight: 0.45
, north america
Weight: 0.45
, thing
Weight: 0.44
, native
Weight: 0.41
, language
Weight: 0.41
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.27
, latin america
Weight: 0.27
, central america
Weight: 0.27
, living thing
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
live during winters 1.00
live in arctic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(eskimo, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(inuit, live during winters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(eskimo, live in arctic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, live in arctic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(eskimo, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(inuit, live during winters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(inuit, live during winters)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inuit, live in arctic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inuit, live in arctic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live in arctic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(inuit, live in arctic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live during winters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(inuit, live during winters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(eskimo, live in arctic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(inuit, live during winters)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(eskimo, live in arctic)