inventory: be classified as nonspendable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as nonspendable 1.00
is classified 0.97
be classified as asset 0.86
be classified as current asset 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(document, is classified)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(document, is classified)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(document, is classified)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(document, is classified)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as asset)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(document, is classified)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inventory, be classified as nonspendable)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(document, is classified)