inventory: be considered current asset

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered current asset 1.00
is current asset 0.97
be considered asset 0.96
be classified as current asset 0.94
be asset to business 0.90
be reported as current asset 0.90
is non asset 0.90
is least asset 0.90
has quality asset 0.90
be classified as asset 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality asset)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(supply, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(supply, has quality asset)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(inventory, be considered asset)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(inventory, be considered asset)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inventory, be considered asset)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is non asset)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(inventory, is least asset)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(inventory, is non asset)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is current asset)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inventory, is non asset)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be considered asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(inventory, is current asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(inventory, is least asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be reported as current asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inventory, is least asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be asset to business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality asset)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is least asset)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be classified as asset)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality asset)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(inventory, be asset to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(inventory, be reported as current asset)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inventory, is non asset)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(inventory, is current asset)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality asset)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality asset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, be asset to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(inventory, is current asset)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(inventory, be classified as current asset)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(inventory, be reported as current asset)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(inventory, be asset to business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, be reported as current asset)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(inventory, be classified as current asset)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(supply, has quality asset)