inventory: be important consideration for managers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important consideration for managers 1.00
have important managers 0.87
have managers 0.83
managers 0.82
be important for management 0.80
be considered current asset 0.76
be good management 0.76
have needed management 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, have important managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(operation, have managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(operation, managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(operation, have important managers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(operation, have managers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(operation, managers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(operation, managers)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, have important managers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operation, have managers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(supply, be good management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, have important managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(operation, have managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(operation, managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(supply, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(supply, be good management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(inventory, be important consideration for managers)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inventory, be important for management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(inventory, have needed management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(inventory, be considered current asset)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(inventory, have needed management)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(inventory, be important for management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inventory, have needed management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inventory, be considered current asset)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(inventory, be considered current asset)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(inventory, be important for management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be considered current asset)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(inventory, have needed management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operation, have managers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(operation, managers)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(operation, have important managers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(supply, be good management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operation, have managers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(operation, managers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(inventory, be important consideration for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(operation, have important managers)