inventory: carrying cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
carrying cost 1.00
has quality cost 0.79
be equal to cost 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(supply, be equal to cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(supply, has quality cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(supply, be equal to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(supply, be equal to cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(inventory, carrying cost)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality cost)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality cost)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(inventory, carrying cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(supply, be equal to cost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(supply, has quality cost)