inventory: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality cost 0.81
has quality evil 0.80
has quality difference 0.77
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(supply, has quality cost)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality question)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality cost)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality cost)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality evil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality evil)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(supply, has quality cost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)