inventory: is taxed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is taxed 1.00
have taxed input 0.88
affect taxes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(distribution, is taxed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supply, have taxed input)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(distribution, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(distribution, is taxed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(supply, have taxed input)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(supply, have taxed input)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(inventory, is taxed)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inventory, affect taxes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(inventory, affect taxes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(inventory, affect taxes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inventory, affect taxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is taxed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inventory, is taxed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(supply, have taxed input)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(distribution, is taxed)