inverse: has quality functions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.47
, application
Weight: 0.41
, operation
Weight: 0.41
, property
Weight: 0.35
, matrix
Weight: 0.34
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, polynomial
Weight: 0.30
, subtraction
Weight: 0.29
, recombination
Weight: 0.29
, simple function
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality functions 1.00
has quality function 0.91
is also function 0.83
is hyperbolic functions 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inverse, has quality functions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(polynomial, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(polynomial, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(inverse, has quality functions)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has quality function)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(inverse, is hyperbolic functions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inverse, is also function)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inverse, has quality function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(inverse, is hyperbolic functions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(inverse, has quality function)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(inverse, is also function)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(inverse, is hyperbolic functions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inverse, has quality function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(inverse, is also function)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inverse, is also function)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(inverse, is hyperbolic functions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inverse, has quality functions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polynomial, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inverse, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)