inversion: has quality questions

Related concepts

Parents	concept Weight: 0.55 , feature Weight: 0.54 , chord Weight: 0.53 , transformation Weight: 0.48 , structure Weight: 0.48
Siblings	parameter Weight: 0.31 , duality Weight: 0.31 , abstraction Weight: 0.31 , logic Weight: 0.31 , theory Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality questions	1.00
questions	0.92
question	0.82
has quality good	0.76
is quality	0.76
has quality better	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(inversion, has quality questions)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(chord, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(inversion, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(chord, is quality)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(chord, is quality)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(duality, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(logic, question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(inversion, has quality questions)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(chord, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(inversion, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(logic, question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(logic, question)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(logic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(logic, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(duality, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(duality, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(logic, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(logic, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(inversion, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(inversion, questions)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(inversion, questions)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(inversion, questions)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(inversion, questions)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality better)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(inversion, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(inversion, has quality better)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(inversion, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(inversion, has quality better)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(inversion, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(inversion, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(inversion, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(chord, is quality)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(logic, question)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(duality, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(logic, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(chord, is quality)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(inversion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)