inversion: is hair method

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, chord
Weight: 0.53
, transformation
Weight: 0.48
, structure
Weight: 0.48
Siblings parameter
Weight: 0.31
, duality
Weight: 0.31
, abstraction
Weight: 0.31
, logic
Weight: 0.31
, theory
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hair method 1.00
be passed into method 0.80
is hair growth 0.77
be effective tool in reasoning 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(parameter, be passed into method)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(parameter, be passed into method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(parameter, be passed into method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inversion, is hair method)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(inversion, is hair growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(inversion, is hair growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(inversion, is hair growth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(inversion, is hair growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inversion, is hair method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(inversion, is hair method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inversion, is hair method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(parameter, be passed into method)