investigator: be held to standard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.72
, lawyer
Weight: 0.65
, official
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings detective
Weight: 0.62
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.33
, state police
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be held to standard 1.00
be held to higher standard 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investigator, be held to standard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(investigator, be held to standard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(investigator, be held to standard)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be held to higher standard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investigator, be held to higher standard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(investigator, be held to higher standard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(investigator, be held to higher standard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be held to standard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investigator, be held to standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(investigator, be held to standard)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police officer, be held to higher standard)