investigator: is hired

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.72
, lawyer
Weight: 0.65
, official
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings detective
Weight: 0.62
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.33
, state police
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hired 1.00
be employed 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(investigator, is hired)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(investigator, be employed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(investigator, be employed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(investigator, be employed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be employed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(investigator, is hired)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(investigator, is hired)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investigator, is hired)