investment: be important in infrastructure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in infrastructure 1.00
be important in enterprise system 0.80
be essential to economy 0.78
be important for economy 0.77
be important in keynesian system 0.77
be important in environment 0.77
be important to economy 0.77
be important for economic growth 0.77
be important in global environment 0.77
be important in free enterprise system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(currency, be important for economy)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(stock, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to economy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(currency, be important for economy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(currency, be important for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, be essential to economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important for economic growth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investment, be important to economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(investment, be essential to economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(investment, be important to economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(investment, be essential to economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(investment, be important for economic growth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(investment, be important to economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(investment, be essential to economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, be important for economic growth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(investment, be important for economic growth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for economic growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(stock, be important to economy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(currency, be important for economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(investment, be important in infrastructure)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for economic growth)