investment: be important in keynesian system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in keynesian system 1.00
be important in enterprise system 0.86
be in different system than time 0.85
be important in free enterprise system 0.84
is ageing important 0.82
be important in environment 0.81
be important in current environment 0.80
be referred as system 0.80
be important for country 0.79
be important in society 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(business activity, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(business activity, be important in society)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(business activity, be important in society)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(currency, be important for country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(business activity, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(currency, be important for country)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(currency, be important for country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(investment, be important in free enterprise system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in free enterprise system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(business activity, be important in society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(currency, be important for country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(business activity, be important in society)