investment: be in landed property best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in landed property best 1.00
be in landed property 0.98
be in property best 0.82
be in property 0.77
is property 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(investment, be in landed property best)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(investment, be in property)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(investment, is property)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(investment, be in property)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(investment, is property)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be in property)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, is property)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(investment, be in property)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(investment, is property)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(investment, be in landed property best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(investment, be in landed property best)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(investment, be in landed property best)