investment: has quality asset

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality asset 1.00
share of is asset 0.90
has quality assets 0.89
have investment value 0.82
be considered assets 0.81
be regarded as current assets 0.80
be regarded as assets 0.79
be considered liquid assets 0.79
is good investment 0.78
has value 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(savings account, is good investment)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(stock, be considered liquid assets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(savings account, is good investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(savings account, is good investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(investment, has quality asset)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality assets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(investment, be regarded as current assets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality assets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(investment, has quality assets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(investment, be regarded as current assets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stock, be considered liquid assets)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(savings account, is good investment)