investment: has quality assets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality assets 1.00
be considered assets 0.92
has quality asset 0.89
compare to assets 0.88
be considered liquid assets 0.88
compare to other assets 0.87
be regarded as assets 0.87
be regarded as current assets 0.86
have investment value 0.82
share of is asset 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(investment, has quality assets)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(investment, be regarded as current assets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(investment, has quality asset)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(investment, be regarded as current assets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality assets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stock, be considered liquid assets)